Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research ; Conference: 10th annual scientific conference of the European Association of Psychosomatic Medicine (EAPM). Wroclaw Poland. 169 (no pagination), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20234884

ABSTRACT

Aims: Onco-hematologic diseases (lymphomas, myeloma, leukemia) require intensive treatment regimens and represent a burden at the affective and instrumental level for their caregivers. The aim of this study was to investigate the link between caregiving burden and depressive symptoms in caregivers of onco-hematologic patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method(s): A convenience sample of 101 caregivers of onco-hematologic patients were recruited at the Hematology Unit of the Holy Spirit Hospital, Pescara, Italy. Most of the caregivers were female (80%) with an average age of 41 years old (SD = 14.01). Participants were administered the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression, and the Fear of Covid-19 Scale (FCV-19S) during two months of the COVID-19-related stay-at-home period (April-May 2021). Result(s): Moderate-to-severe depression (PHQ-9 > 10) were reported by 36% of caregivers. Depressive symptoms were associated with caregivers' time-dependence (r = 0.43), developmental (r = 0.61), physical (r = 0.72), social (r = 0.60), and emotional burden (r = 0.43) (all ps < 0.001). CBI explained 53% of the PHQ-9 variance, particularly the physical (beta = 0.54, p < 0.001) and the social (beta = 0.30, p < 0.01) dimensions of burden. Unexpectedly, COVID-19 was not associated with caregiver burden and depressive symptoms. Conclusion(s): Caregivers of onco-hematologic patients may experience depression due to the burden of caregiving, which is related mostly to the patients' disease rather than extraordinary, even dramatic events such as the pandemic. Psychological interventions are needed for them.Copyright © 2023

2.
Tumori ; 107(2 SUPPL):76-77, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1571637

ABSTRACT

Background: Healthcare authorities at National and Regional level have prioritized vaccinations for cancer patients. Patients with cancer are among the very high-risk groups for adverse outcomes including hospitalization and/or death from COVID-19. The Medical Oncology Unit in Florence encourage vaccination for all patients with cancer being actively treated, regardless of treatment type, performance status, or life expectancy. A COVID-19 vaccination campaign, with the support of the Health Departments, was launched on April 02. The Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA or the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines, based on availability, were used. Data regarding the safety of the mRNA vaccines in patients with cancer were collected. Material (patients) and methods: Between April 02 and May 07, vaccination was offered to patients actively undergoing cancer treatment. Side effects were monitored via detailed telephone questionnaires. Results: 913 patients were offered the vaccine. 22 (2%) refused the vaccination, mostly due to fear of side-effects, 73 (8%) patients did not answer the call, while 181 (20%) patients were had already been vaccinated. 637 patients received the first vaccination dose, of whom 601 (94%) received the second dose. The second dose was omitted if the patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection between three and six months before the first dose. The most common side-effects after the first dose were local, with 126 (24%) of 523 evaluable patients reporting pain at the site of injection. Systemic side-effects included fatigue (34 [6%]), headache (18 [3%]), muscle pain (14 [2%]), fever (17 [3%] and chills (3 [1%]). Two of 523 patients were admitted to hospital for acute allergic reactions. Three patients died after the first dose due to disease progression and two patients refused the second dose. More systemic side-effects were observed after the second dose of vaccine. Pain at the injection site was reported in 18 [3%] of the 502 evaluable patient, whereas the most common systemic side effects were muscle pain (39 [34%]), fatigue (19 [34%]), headache (31 [16%]), fever (102 [10%]), chills (17 [10%]). None of the reported side-effects required admission to hospital or any other special intervention. Two patients developed asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection after the first and the second dose of vaccine, respectively. Conclusions: The reassuring safety signal regarding the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer support call for vaccination of cancer patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL